NET SETTLER MIGRATION TO AUSTRALIA BY BIRTHPLACE: 1947-98

Charles A. Price

Between 1947 and 1998 there was a net inflow of 4.8 million migrants to Australia. Only 29.6 per cent were born in Britain and Ireland. Other surprising findings are that more were born in Indo China than Greece and Cyprus and that more were born in New Zealand than Italy.

The accompanying table showing net settler migration to Australia from 1947 to 1998 gives estimates of the birthplace origin of foreign-born persons settling in Australia between mid-1947 and mid-1998.

‘Settlers’ are here defined as foreign-born persons who arrived in Australia, some calling themselves permanent arrivals or settlers, and others calling themselves temporary arrivals or visitors, and who have stayed long enough to be considered part of Australia’s permanent population. Other persons arrived calling themselves settlers but, after a few months or years, decided to return to their original home-country, or go on to settle in a third country. They have been deducted from the settler totals and the table’s statistics are therefore net statistics.

Also deducted are persons who arrived as settlers, returned to their old country and, after a while, regretted leaving Australia so came back calling themselves settlers for a second time. I think it incorrect to double-count such persons in the net settler total so I count each person only once. (Methods of estimating ‘second-timers’ are in my Immigration and Ethnicity , published by the Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, Canberra, 1996, pp 4, 20.)

Another anomaly is that, in 1988-89 and 1989-90, some Austrian-born persons were miscounted by the immigration computer as Australian-born. We used census and other material to estimate their number and amended the Austrian-born and Australian-born totals by some 9,000.

Since 1959, when new immigration statistics were introduced giving birthplace of all arrivals and departures, it has been comparatively easy to estimate the net settler movement of different birthplace groupings. Before then the immigration statistics gave nationality only (not even citizenship). So, persons born in Malta or Cyprus were lost in the broad category of ‘British Nationality’. To estimate the birthplaces of the Maltese and Cypriot net settler movement of 1947 to 1961, (it was easier to work to the nearest census year 1961 than 1959), I used statistics given in the census of 1947, 1954 and 1961. When using these census statistics it was necessary to estimate deaths to intercensal immigrants. I also used census birthplace statistics, and special surveys by Professor J. Zubrzycki, to estimate the birthplaces of those among ‘stateless’.

It is important to remember the ‘birthplace’ totals are not the same as ‘ethnic’ totals. Anyone wishing to convert the 50,400 total of Sri Lankan-born settlers into ethnic totals must use ancestry, language and other material to estimate the British and Dutch elements in the total as well as the Sri Lankese and Tamil elements. So with Maoris born in New Zealand, and such like.

Table 1: Net settler migration to Australia by birthplace, 1947-98

Origin

Sub-region

Sub-total

Total

Per cent

Britain and Ireland

England (incl. Cornwall)

Scotland

Ireland

Wales

Isles

1,058,400

198,000

115,200

49,600

4,200

 

 

 

 

 

1,425,400

 

 

 

 

 

29.6

North and West Europe

Netherlands

Germany

Scandinavia

Austria

France

Other

115,400

113,900

33,400

27,800

23,100

21,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

334,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.0

East Europe

Former Yugoslavia

Poland

Baltic States

Hungary

Czech/Slovak

Russia, Belo-Russia, Ukraine

Other East Europe

217,900

127,400

30,400

44,300

25,300

62,600

18,800

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

526,700

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.0

South Europe

Italy

Greece, Cyprus

Malta

Portugal

Spain

Other South Europe

264,600

173,000

64,400

17,100

13,500

1,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

534,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

11.1

West Asia and

North Africa

Lebanon-Syria

Turkey

Israel

Other West Asia

Egypt

Other North Africa

81,400

30,800

13,100

38,400

28,100

4,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

196,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.1

South Asia

India

Sri Lanka

Other

95,900

50,400

26,400

 

 

 

172,700

 

 

 

3.6

East Asia

China, Hong Kong, Singapore

Indo-China

Philippines

Malaysia

Indonesia

Thailand

Japan

Korea

Other East Asia

234,100

210,400

111,400

88,000

48,800

26,400

36,400

35,600

6,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

798,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.6

America

USA

Canada

Chile

Argentina

Uruguay

El Salvador

Other America

68,500

31,100

29,100

12,700

10,200

9,600

33,100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

194,300

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.0

Africa (excl. North)

South Africa

Mauritius

Other Commonwealth

Other

71,600

20,000

33,600

9,100

 

 

 

 

134,300

 

 

 

 

2.8

Pacific

New Zealand

Fiji

P.N.G.

Samoa

Tonga

Other

384,200

43,300

30,500

16,700

9,500

5,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

489,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

10.2

Net Settlers

 

 

 

4,806,200

100.0

Australian-born

Net Total

 

 

 

-548,500

4,257,700

 

 

Notes: ‘Other Pacific’ includes Australian Territories, Not Stated, At Sea;

True ethnic statistics would adjust birthplace total for British -born in India; Indian-born, Fiji; Chinese-born; Maoris-born NZ etc.

Sources: 1947-61 Net Migration by Nationality or Country of residence; 1961-98 Birthplace

It is also important to note that the substantial net loss of Australian-born persons — estimated here at 548,500 — is not purely a loss of old Anglo-Celtic families. Much is due to non-British settlers returning to their old countries and taking their Australian-born children with them.

In general the table shows that immigration from the United Kingdom and Ireland has not dominated post-war immigration. In fact, it has made up less than 30 per cent. The table shows that net settlement from East Asian countries now exceeds net settlement from Southern Europe. This is not only because the settlement of East Asia-born persons has increased very considerably in recent years but also because, during the last three decades, return migration of Italian and Greek settlers to their old homes has often exceeded the number of new migrants from those countries.

The table under discussion, including further details on sources, has been prepared for my forthcoming monograph entitled Australians All: Who On Earth Are We?


Back to Contents Vol. 6 No. 4

Back to People and Place Home Page